Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 24.06.2025 07:33
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Don't miss the crescent moon shining close to Mars on May 31 - Space
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Thank you.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
ESA studying impacts of proposed NASA budget cuts - SpaceNews
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Russia can stop this any time.
346 Million-Year-Old Fossil Rewrites the Story of Life on Land - SciTechDaily
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Let’s just make it real clear:
ChatGPT outage shows just how many people are using AI at work - MarketWatch
What’s next?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Jerome Powell’s Exit Leaves The Fed On An Uncertain Path - Seeking Alpha